Where the world can't agree what's happening
Every situation here is ranked by how much its reality is contested — not how bad it is, but how far apart the interpretations are. The index blends four measured signals: the model's ambiguity read (40%), how far competing worldviews diverge (35%), the share of claims in active dispute (15%), and how much forecasters disagree (10%) — renormalized when a signal is absent. AllSides tells you how one story is framed; this measures where the framings split — as a number, across every dynamic.
The index is a weighted blend of four inputs, renormalized over whichever are available for a given dynamic, so it is populated from the first day and sharpens as coverage deepens: ambiguity — the VUCA engine's read of interpretive spread (40%); worldview divergence — how far published faction stances disagree, scored daily by an LLM judge (35%); contested claims — the share of a dynamic's published claims flagged as disputed (15%); and forecaster disagreement — the crowd probability spread on its open questions (10%). A chip reads — until that signal has data.
Running a newsletter or research page? Embed this index — it stays live as the data moves.