Same events, different realities
These are the worldview communities whose competing interpretations we track across every dynamic — what each believes is really happening, whom it trusts, and where its reading diverges from the others. The profiles are analytic descriptions, not endorsements; the divergence between them is what the Ambiguity dimension measures.
The desk is still curating the first faction profiles — they appear here once an editor publishes them.
Stances are drafted by a model reasoning inside each faction's profile — its beliefs, trusted sources, and language — grounded in the claims we have published, then reviewed by an editor before appearing anywhere. History is append-only: when a community's reading shifts, the old stance stays on the record. A daily judge scores how far the interpretations have diverged on each dynamic, and that spread feeds the Ambiguity component of the VUCA score.